``If Jimmy breaks a window, he is punished.''
This is a conditional proposition because it consists a condition and a consequent. The condition is ``Jimmy breaks a window'', which can be true or false. The consequent is ``Jimmy get punished'', which can be true or false, as well.
As a conditional proposition, when is it true, and when is it false?
In our particular example, the conditional proposition is true if and only if the following are true:
But what if Jimmy does not break a window? As it turns out, it does not matter!
Functionally, to say that ``if Jimmy breaks a window, he gets punished'' is the same as saying ``(Jimmy does not break a window) or (he gets punished).'' The parantheses are only there to help group the components of the disjunction (``or'').
In the context of mathematics, we can now have some fun. Let's consider the following proposition:
``if ,
.''
Your first reaction is that this is not a proposition, because its
truth value depends on the values of and
. However, a closer
examination suggests that the values of
and
do not matter!
Let us consider the alternate form of this proposition:
``not or
.''
Or even better,
`` or
.''
Is it true (for real numbers) that at least one of or
has to be true? In different module, we'll explore how to say more about
and
. For the time being, we'll just say that we know that
and
are real numbers.
Copyright © 2006-08-23 by Tak Auyeung